Skip to main content

Critically discuss why a good performance management system can assist an organisation to ensure the performance of its staff supports the achievement of the organisational strategies

By

This 2,500 word assignment involves understanding and application of the theory and concepts from modules 1, 2 and 3.
Format: Essay
Length: 2500 words maximum (including introduction and conclusion)
Content: Modules 1, 2 & 3
Value: 45% of the total course assessment
This assignment involves understanding and application of the theory and concepts from modules 1, 2 and 3. You will need to use your text, selected readings, academic journals and the MGT8030 study modules to develop your work.
Tasks
There are two tasks to be completed and each should be presented as a specific section within your essay.
1. Critically discuss why a good performance management system can assist an organisation to ensure the performance of its staff supports the achievement of the organisational strategies. (1200 words maximum – 20 marks).
2. Critically discuss how a well designed performance management system might be used to identify and manage aspects of unsatisfactory performance in an organisation. (1300 words maximum – 25 marks).
Presentation
1. Essay format. Use of some headings is acceptable (and encouraged) – especially to differentiate the two assignment tasks. Assignments should be typed in Times New Roman 12 font, using 1½ or single spacing. Papers that do not use an essay format (e.g. reports) will be penalised.
2. Harvard referencing must be used. All assignments must be properly referenced, i.e. all sources should be acknowledged, throughout your essay. It is not possible to satisfy the requirements of a course like this without extensive use of reference material to support your discussion/argument. The required system is the Harvard referencing system - find it in the USQ Library site. A list of references listing all sources referred to in alphabetical order should be given at the end of the assignment.
3. Refer to the Assignment Marking Sheet below for an indication of expected content, process and presentation issues. However, this should not be used as the essay structure – the two tasks listed above constitute the required structure of the assignment.

Marking criteria for MGT8030 assignment – S1 2017
Task 1 Content – ensure you have Inadequate
49% Acceptable
50–64% Good
65–74% Very Good
75–84% Excellent
85%
Explained the broad framework in which strategy is implemented within organisations.
Critically discussed the connections between strategy and individual performance outcomes.
Critically discussed how individual performance is connected to overall organisational performance.
Demonstrated understanding of relevant concepts from Module 2.
Comments
Task 2 Content – ensure you have Inadequate
49% Acceptable
50–64% Good
65–74% Very Good
75–84% Excellent
85%
Explained the difference between 'under' and 'non' performance & discussed how you might identify each within a PM system
Discussed how you might manage both 'under' & 'non' performance issues to achieve outcomes for both the individual & the organisation.
Demonstrated understanding of relevant concepts from Module 2.
Comments
Overall Process – you have Inadequate
49% Acceptable
50–64% Good
65–74% Very Good
75–84% Excellent
85%
Critically discussed relevant issues, theory and concepts
Presented persuasive and cogent arguments. (Poor expression & citation of sources detracts from the quality, persuasiveness and cogency of the argument.)
Derived logical conclusions based on the evidence (ie. Reference sources)
Comments
Overall Presentation – you have This aspect of your writing needs attention Completed to an acceptable standard
Used correct referencing format and cited all evidence (failure to reference in your assignment will result in an automatic fail mark. Inadequate referencing may be penalised)
Presented the assignment using essay format (with a relevant introductions and conclusions – if a Report format is used it will be penalised)
Used correct spelling, punctuation and grammar
Observed the maximum word limit/s
Comments
The above is not an exhaustive list of issues relevant to this assignment. The content issues cover some of the more obvious issues that you may have included in your discussion. The process issues include some of the considerations about the way in which you presented your discussion. Both sets of criteria have affected the determination of the final mark.
Task 1 /20 Task 2 /25 TOTAL /45

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Starting with this provided code, add the following functionality

By
1.Starting with this provided code, add the following functionality: Replace hardcoded strings “Zero”, “One”, “Two”, “Three” in the ArrayList based on user typed input (use Scanner or JOptionPane classes). The user will be prompted for the String to be stored in the ArrayList and then hit enter. The user will be able to continue to add items to the ArrayList until they just hit enter without typing anything. Once the user does this (hits enter without typing anything), the program will display all of the elements of the ArrayList, both the index and String values, in a table. It will do this via a single loop making use of an iterator method. 2. Starting with this provided code, add the following functionality: Use a Try/Catch block so that the exception is caught and the program exits a bit more gracefully. Save this file as TryCatch.java. (Be sure to rename the Public Class accordingly.) Starting with the provided code again (without the Try/Catch block), fix the code so that
2 comments
Read more

Theoretical concepts with practical accounting task application based on the topics from the subject

By
  Assessment 1 Assessment Type: Written Report - individual assessment Purpose: This assessment is designed to reinforce the subject content and develop students’ skills and application of knowledge of the subject content to business situations. This assessment relates to learning outcomes a, b and c. Value: 20% Due Date: Students are to upload their submission to the Turnitin link on the KOI Moodle subject home page by 5:00pm Friday of Week 6. Topic: This assignment covers contemporary theoretical concepts with practical accounting task application based on the topics from the subject. Task Details: This assignment requires students to access the Conceptual Framework of Accounting www.aasb.qov.au and select the conceptual framework tab. Students are then required to access paragraph 2.4 fundamental qualitative characteristics. Students should: 1- Prepare a summary of the requirements for general-purpose financial reports with respect to these fundamental qualitative characteristics. 2
1 comment
Read more

Josie Eskander

By
  Question 1: Task 1: Report Assume you are Josie Eskander. You are writing in response to techno trading P/L’s advertisement of a new laptop at 20% below normal price. You want information on brand name, availability of service and repairs, delivery times and methods of payment. Write the letter using the seven basic parts of the letter. In the opening paragraph present a clear and courteous request. Secondly write a response from techno trading giving details and proposing the sale. Provide draft of both emails in the space below. Question 2: Task 2: Report In pairs, nominate a good and a bad letter writer. Discuss the key differences. Write a good/bad letter from techno training to Alex Antonov accepting/declining his proposal to invest in the business Question 3: Task 3: Report Write a letter from techno trading p/l to a new client ‘new realities p/l’ urging them to buy techno new virtual reality software. Make a strong argument for the product. Question 4: Task 4: Report Write a l
Post a Comment
Read more