- Overview
- To fully understand and evaluate the scientific information we must build our critical thinking skills. Critical thinking has sometimes been summed up with the following four key points: examine assumptions, discern hidden values, evaluate evidence, assess conclusions (Myers).
- Instructions
- For this discussion, you will need to choose an article that relates to the topics in chapter 7. You must:
- 1) Summarize the science of the article
- 2) Explain how the article relates to chapter 7
- 3) Specifically, answer the following questions about the article:
- • What are the assumptions of the authors of the website?
- • Are there hidden values (or biases)?
- • Is the information accurate? Is it reliable?
- • Can the authors make the conclusions they are making with the information they provided? Is there other information that refutes their conclusions?
- ****Note: I am using chemistry: the central science by brown
- Assignment status: Solved by our Writing Team at EssayCabinet.com
- CLICK HERE TO ORDER THIS PAPER AT EssayCabinet.com
Which of the listed variables does a researcher mainly use in his or her approach with intent to establish validity - specifically, construct validity? · independent variable · confounding variable · dependent variable · participant variable · extraneous variable · third variable Instructions: With our engagement in this discussion we will likely touch upon learning objectives/competencies 2.2 and 2.4 as dependent upon the various variable selections and replies. (a) Please briefly define the two concepts (variable type(s) selected from the list and construct validity) using our text by Cozby and Bates (2015) or another credible source. (b) Then, support your view...
Comments
Post a Comment