Skip to main content

The impact of chronic diseases on health and social care

 The impact of chronic diseases on health and social care

Intent:
This early, low-stakes assessment item focuses on understanding the impact of the increase of chronic diseases on the health and social care systems.
Objective:
This assessment task addresses the subject learning objectives:
A: Consider the key imperatives for meeting health service objectives related to safety, quality, cost-effectiveness and jurisdictional legislative requirements within a governance context;
B: Critically appraise contemporary strategies and frameworks designed to manage quality, risk and cost within the healthcare environment;
C: Propose improvements in safety, quality and cost-effectiveness at a local healthcare organisation level by identifying issues, considering ethical implications, offering policy direction and formulation and recommending priorities for action;
D: Create a variety of ways in which complex issues can be effectively communicated for a variety of target audiences.
Course intended learning outcome(s):
1.1 Critique, interpret and synthesise data and research findings to develop safe, effective and creative evidence-based solutions to healthcare challenges.
2.1 Justify and demonstrate appropriate leadership styles and skills necessary to effectively manage, evaluate and innovate healthcare services utilising contemporary local, national and international perspectives.
3.1 Create and lead social and ethical accountability to ensure efficient use of resources and equity of access to optimal and safe health care.
Length: 750 words (Reference list is not included in the word count)
References: APA 7th* (No minimum number or range of references)
*Please note that if you provide no referencing or incorrect/incomplete referencing you will lose marks on your assessment.
Formatting requirements: 12pt, double-spaced - no other requirements.
Scenario: Diabetes in Postcode 2770
Background:
Chronic disease is a major concern in Australia and across the world.
Population ageing, rising disability and complex and co-morbid conditions have profound impacts on people’s lives including individuals, families and communities. They are also expensive to treat and can follow a progressive, episodic pathway to increased frequency and severity, up to and including acute interventions.
Diabetes in 2770:
One of these conditions is diabetes, especially Type 2 diabetes which is growing in prevalence in many communities across Australia. General Practice data indicates rates have been rising, not falling, in recent years.
2770 has a very diverse community with a substantial Indigenous population and an immigrant demography with many cultures, languages and cultural backgrounds. It is also, generally speaking, a lower socio-economic environment although urban development is pushing west into the 2770 area, and more medium to high rise apartments are being built.
As health managers involved in clinical services, programs and event-specific projects, this is the kind of scenario you will encounter as you progress in your career. If you work in aged care, disability and related fields, these health problems will often be major factors in your client’s lives.
Demographic map for 2770 (Click on the link below)
2016 Census Community Profiles: 2770, NSW (abs.gov.au)
Task
Thinking about the scope, complexity and burden of chronic disease what do you see as
(a) the major drivers for, and
(b) consequences of rising chronic disease for the health and social care systems?
• Write 375 words in total for each of the two points (a) and (b) from the perspective of your current service.
• If you are in healthcare, write from that perspective, if you are in aged or disability care or a related field, use that as your focus. This just means we expect you to write from your area of experience and professional comfort.
• Assessment 1: The impact of chronic diseases on health and social care
Assessment 1: The impact of chronic diseases on health and social care
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSynthesize the scope of the chronic disease problem.
Provides a concise synthesis of the scope of the chronic disease problem from their perspective. 30 to 25.5 pts
HD (High distinction)
Clearly and logically describes the scope of the chronic disease problem in the case study community and provides a critical analysis of all the relevant issues. 25.5 to 22.5 pts
D (Distinction)
Clearly describes the scope of the chronic disease problem and provides an analysis of most of the relevant issues. 22.5 to 19.5 pts
C (Credit)
Describes the scope of the chronic disease problem in the case study community. Includes descriptions of issues and provides an analysis of some of the relevant issues. 19.5 to 15.0 pts
P (Pass)
Describes the scope of the chronic disease problem in the case study community and provides some analysis of the relevant issues. 15 to 0 pts
X (Fail)
Limited or no description of the scope of the chronic disease problem in the case study community.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse brief but specific examples in the assessment of the chronic disease scenario.
Provides some specific but brief examples that illustrate their assessment of the chronic disease scenario 40 to 34.0 pts
HD (High distinction)
Clearly and logically describes the scope of the chronic disease problem in the case study community and provides a critical analysis of all the relevant issues. 34 to 30.0 pts
D (Distinction)
Provides specific, relevant and comprehensive examples that illustrate most of chronic disease scenario 30 to 26.0 pts
C (Credit)
Provides appropriate examples that illustrate much of the chronic disease scenario. 26 to 20.0 pts
P (Pass)
Provides some examples that illustrate some of the chronic disease scenario. 20 to 0 pts
X (Fail)
Limited or no examples relating to the chronic disease scenario Use of unreliable sources.
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvaluate perspectives and interpretates relevant and current literature.
Validates perspectives through the correct interpretation of relevant and current literature. 20 to 17.0 pts
HD (High distinction)
Explicit links between the chronic disease scenario and a review of the literature. 17 to 15.0 pts
D (Distinction)
Link between the chronic disease scenario and health or social care and the literature is described. 15 to 13.0 pts
C (Credit)
Link between the chronic disease scenario and the literature is apparent. Discussion to health and or social care is largely appropriate. 13 to 10.0 pts
P (Pass)
Link between the chronic disease scenario and the health and or social care literature is somewhat apparent. 10 to 0 pts
X (Fail)
Limited or no description of the link between the chronic disease scenario and the literature in health and or social care not apparent.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, formatting, style and referencing
Produces correct grammar, spelling, formatting, style and reference list. 10 to 8.5 pts
HD (High distinction)
Fluent writing style with consistent report-style formatting, use of headings and sub-headings, and accurate referencing. 8.5 to 7.5 pts
D (Distinction)
Clear language with consistent formatting, use of headings and sub-headings, and accurate referencing. 7.5 to 6.5 pts
C (Credit)
Generally clear language with mainly consistent formatting and few errors in referencing. 6.5 to 5.0 pts
P (Pass)
Writing is less clear, with deficits in spelling, grammar, punctuation or referencing. Inconsistent formatting. 5 to 0 pts
X (Fail)
Writing is unclear, with numerous deficits in spelling, grammar, punctuation, formatting, or referencing.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAcademic English Language Level (Does not count toward final grade)
If you receive a Level 1 or Level 2 please refer to assessment instructions for further information.
threshold: 2.0 pts 3 pts
Level 3 - Satisfactory - The writing is well expressed; it is comprehensible and coherent throughout. There are very few grammatical errors and vocabulary is appropriate to the context. The sentences and paragraphs have a logical flow and are clearly linked. 2 pts
Level 2 - Needs Developing - The writing is generally comprehensible. There may be errors in grammar and vocabulary but they do not affect clarity. Sentences and paragraphs are mostly well structured. 1 pts
Level 1 - Unsatisfactory - The writing requires effort and concentration to understand. There are some serious errors in grammar and vocabulary that affect clarity of communication. Sentences are incomplete or poorly structured.
--
Total Points: 100

GET SOLUTION FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT

CLICK HERE TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

TO BE RE-WRITTEN FROM THE SCRATCH

NO PLAGIARISM

  • Original and non-plagiarized custom papers- Our writers develop their writing from scratch unless you request them to rewrite, edit or proofread your paper.
  • Timely Deliverycapitalessaywriting.com believes in beating the deadlines that our customers have imposed because we understand how important it is.
  • Customer satisfaction- Customer satisfaction. We have an outstanding customer care team that is always ready and willing to listen to you, collect your instructions and make sure that your custom writing needs are satisfied
  • Confidential- It’s secure to place an order at capitalessaywriting.com We won’t reveal your private information to anyone else.
  • Writing services provided by experts- Looking for expert essay writers, thesis and dissertation writers, personal statement writers, or writers to provide any other kind of custom writing service?
  • Enjoy Please Note-You have come to the most reliable academic writing site that will sort all assignments that that you could be having. We write essays, research papers, term papers, research proposals.  The impact of chronic diseases on health and social care

Get Professionally Written Papers From The Writing Experts 

Green Order Now Button PNG Image | Transparent PNG Free Download on SeekPNGOur Zero Plagiarism Policy | New Essays

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Starting with this provided code, add the following functionality

1.Starting with this provided code, add the following functionality: Replace hardcoded strings “Zero”, “One”, “Two”, “Three” in the ArrayList based on user typed input (use Scanner or JOptionPane classes). The user will be prompted for the String to be stored in the ArrayList and then hit enter. The user will be able to continue to add items to the ArrayList until they just hit enter without typing anything. Once the user does this (hits enter without typing anything), the program will display all of the elements of the ArrayList, both the index and String values, in a table. It will do this via a single loop making use of an iterator method. 2. Starting with this provided code, add the following functionality: Use a Try/Catch block so that the exception is caught and the program exits a bit more gracefully. Save this file as TryCatch.java. (Be sure to rename the Public Class accordingly.) Starting with the provided code again (without the Try/Catch block), fix the code so that

Josie Eskander

  Question 1: Task 1: Report Assume you are Josie Eskander. You are writing in response to techno trading P/L’s advertisement of a new laptop at 20% below normal price. You want information on brand name, availability of service and repairs, delivery times and methods of payment. Write the letter using the seven basic parts of the letter. In the opening paragraph present a clear and courteous request. Secondly write a response from techno trading giving details and proposing the sale. Provide draft of both emails in the space below. Question 2: Task 2: Report In pairs, nominate a good and a bad letter writer. Discuss the key differences. Write a good/bad letter from techno training to Alex Antonov accepting/declining his proposal to invest in the business Question 3: Task 3: Report Write a letter from techno trading p/l to a new client ‘new realities p/l’ urging them to buy techno new virtual reality software. Make a strong argument for the product. Question 4: Task 4: Report Write a l

Sandra Coke is vice president for research and development at Great Lakes Foods (GLF), a large snack food company that has approximately 1,000 employees

Chapter 2 I Trait Approach 33 CASE 2.1 Choosing a New Director of Research Sandra Coke is vice president for research and development at Great Lakes Foods (GLF), a large snack food company that has approximately 1,000 employees. As a result of a recent reorganization, Sandra must choose the new director of research. The director will report directly to Sandra and will be responsible for developing and testing new products. The research division of GLF employs about 200 people. The choice of directors is important because Sandra is receiving pressure from the president and board of GLF to improve the company's overall growth and productivity. Sandra has identified three candidates for the position. Each candidate is at the same managerial level. She is having difficulty choosing one of them because each has very strong credentials. Alexa Smith is a longtime employee of GLF who started part-time in the mailroom while in high school. After finishing school, Alexa worked in as many as