Skip to main content

Outline the duties/responsibilities (eg CA s. 181) breached and explain why the duties were breached.

HA3021 CORPORATIONS LAW 
T1 2017 
GROUP ASSIGNMENT 
Maximum marks: 20 (20%) 
Instructions: 
This assignment is to be submitted by the due date in both soft-copy (Safeassign – Bb) and hard copy. 
The assignment is to be submitted in accordance with assessment policy stated in the Subject Outline and Student Handbook. 
It is the responsibility of the student submitting the work to ensure that the work is in fact his/her own work. Ensure that when incorporating the works of others into your submission that it appropriately acknowledged. 
Group assignment – students are to group themselves to a minimum of 3 and a maximum of 5 students per group 
Research on an Australian case (not more than 10 years old since the decision by the Court) involving breach of company director’s/officer’s duties. 
Write a report outlining the following: 
1. Case introduction. 
2. Outline the duties/responsibilities (eg CA s. 181) breached and explain why the duties were breached. 
3. Discuss and critically ANALYSE the court/tribunal decision and the reason for the decision in view of the Corporations Act. 
4. Present the report in class or video recording. Your lecturer will advise which is appropriate. All members must present on the day or a fail will be recorded. Presentations will be of a maximum of 5 minutes. 
Maximum word limit – 2,000 words 
PLEASE NOTE: 
• Submit group assignment on-line (must do Safe Assign Check). Only one group member. 
• Please fill in and submit to your lecturer the Corporate Law Rubric Report in class by Week 5 the latest. 
• Each team member also must also submit a Law Peer Evaluation with their presentation/video 
• NO SAFE ASSIGN WORK WILL NOT BE CORRECTED AND THE GROUP WILL HAVE A MARK OF 0 (ZERO). 
• GROUPS OF LESS THAN 3 AND MORE THAN 5 PEOPLE WILL RECEIVE A PENALTY OF 10 POINTS. 
• Proper referencing in accordance with school regulations

Logo

Get 100% Original papers from writing experts.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Starting with this provided code, add the following functionality

1.Starting with this provided code, add the following functionality: Replace hardcoded strings “Zero”, “One”, “Two”, “Three” in the ArrayList based on user typed input (use Scanner or JOptionPane classes). The user will be prompted for the String to be stored in the ArrayList and then hit enter. The user will be able to continue to add items to the ArrayList until they just hit enter without typing anything. Once the user does this (hits enter without typing anything), the program will display all of the elements of the ArrayList, both the index and String values, in a table. It will do this via a single loop making use of an iterator method. 2. Starting with this provided code, add the following functionality: Use a Try/Catch block so that the exception is caught and the program exits a bit more gracefully. Save this file as TryCatch.java. (Be sure to rename the Public Class accordingly.) Starting with the provided code again (without the Try/Catch block), fix the code so that

Josie Eskander

  Question 1: Task 1: Report Assume you are Josie Eskander. You are writing in response to techno trading P/L’s advertisement of a new laptop at 20% below normal price. You want information on brand name, availability of service and repairs, delivery times and methods of payment. Write the letter using the seven basic parts of the letter. In the opening paragraph present a clear and courteous request. Secondly write a response from techno trading giving details and proposing the sale. Provide draft of both emails in the space below. Question 2: Task 2: Report In pairs, nominate a good and a bad letter writer. Discuss the key differences. Write a good/bad letter from techno training to Alex Antonov accepting/declining his proposal to invest in the business Question 3: Task 3: Report Write a letter from techno trading p/l to a new client ‘new realities p/l’ urging them to buy techno new virtual reality software. Make a strong argument for the product. Question 4: Task 4: Report Write a l

Sandra Coke is vice president for research and development at Great Lakes Foods (GLF), a large snack food company that has approximately 1,000 employees

Chapter 2 I Trait Approach 33 CASE 2.1 Choosing a New Director of Research Sandra Coke is vice president for research and development at Great Lakes Foods (GLF), a large snack food company that has approximately 1,000 employees. As a result of a recent reorganization, Sandra must choose the new director of research. The director will report directly to Sandra and will be responsible for developing and testing new products. The research division of GLF employs about 200 people. The choice of directors is important because Sandra is receiving pressure from the president and board of GLF to improve the company's overall growth and productivity. Sandra has identified three candidates for the position. Each candidate is at the same managerial level. She is having difficulty choosing one of them because each has very strong credentials. Alexa Smith is a longtime employee of GLF who started part-time in the mailroom while in high school. After finishing school, Alexa worked in as many as