Skip to main content

shared governance model on Marquis and Huston (2015, p. 277

Diverse Organizational Charts

For anyone working in a health care setting, looking at the organizational chart can provide useful information about the context that affects daily practice as well as the achievement of longer term goals. For managers, understanding the structure and dynamics portrayed in such a chart—as well as those that may be missing—is especially important.
For this Discussion, you analyze an organizational chart from the point of view of nursing management.
To Prepare
  • Obtain a copy of an organizational chart which does not have a shared governance model. You can find a list of current magnet–recognized hospitals at: http://www.nursecredentialing.org/Magnet/FindaMagnetFacility
  • Examine both organizational charts through the lens of management (i.e., think about the responsibilities and concerns that you, as a manager, may have).
  • Review  Marquis and Huston (2015) page 279, Display 12.5 The 14 Forces of Magnetism for Magnet Hospital Status and Learning Exercise 12.4
  • Think about how the organizational charts align?
  • Think about how communication actually occurs at your organization
Post and Compare and contrast the organizational chart you identified to the shared governance model on Marquis and Huston (2015, p. 277). Consider major components of organizational structure and communication such as centrality and decentralization. Describe at least five of the “forces of magnetism” and compare how the magnet and non–magnet organizations meet them or need improvement in these areas (Marquis & Huston, 2015, p. 279, Display 12.5). CLICK HERE TO ORDER THIS PAPER………………………NO PLAGIARISM Get 100% Original papers from the writing experts Logo     CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS……

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Starting with this provided code, add the following functionality

1.Starting with this provided code, add the following functionality: Replace hardcoded strings “Zero”, “One”, “Two”, “Three” in the ArrayList based on user typed input (use Scanner or JOptionPane classes). The user will be prompted for the String to be stored in the ArrayList and then hit enter. The user will be able to continue to add items to the ArrayList until they just hit enter without typing anything. Once the user does this (hits enter without typing anything), the program will display all of the elements of the ArrayList, both the index and String values, in a table. It will do this via a single loop making use of an iterator method. 2. Starting with this provided code, add the following functionality: Use a Try/Catch block so that the exception is caught and the program exits a bit more gracefully. Save this file as TryCatch.java. (Be sure to rename the Public Class accordingly.) Starting with the provided code again (without the Try/Catch block), fix the code so that

Josie Eskander

  Question 1: Task 1: Report Assume you are Josie Eskander. You are writing in response to techno trading P/L’s advertisement of a new laptop at 20% below normal price. You want information on brand name, availability of service and repairs, delivery times and methods of payment. Write the letter using the seven basic parts of the letter. In the opening paragraph present a clear and courteous request. Secondly write a response from techno trading giving details and proposing the sale. Provide draft of both emails in the space below. Question 2: Task 2: Report In pairs, nominate a good and a bad letter writer. Discuss the key differences. Write a good/bad letter from techno training to Alex Antonov accepting/declining his proposal to invest in the business Question 3: Task 3: Report Write a letter from techno trading p/l to a new client ‘new realities p/l’ urging them to buy techno new virtual reality software. Make a strong argument for the product. Question 4: Task 4: Report Write a l

Sandra Coke is vice president for research and development at Great Lakes Foods (GLF), a large snack food company that has approximately 1,000 employees

Chapter 2 I Trait Approach 33 CASE 2.1 Choosing a New Director of Research Sandra Coke is vice president for research and development at Great Lakes Foods (GLF), a large snack food company that has approximately 1,000 employees. As a result of a recent reorganization, Sandra must choose the new director of research. The director will report directly to Sandra and will be responsible for developing and testing new products. The research division of GLF employs about 200 people. The choice of directors is important because Sandra is receiving pressure from the president and board of GLF to improve the company's overall growth and productivity. Sandra has identified three candidates for the position. Each candidate is at the same managerial level. She is having difficulty choosing one of them because each has very strong credentials. Alexa Smith is a longtime employee of GLF who started part-time in the mailroom while in high school. After finishing school, Alexa worked in as many as