Skip to main content

Data collection is key to enforcing a position on a given subject.

By

POST by Will
Data collection is key to enforcing a position on a given subject.  This position may be to disprove a current belief or to add proof to why it is a fact.  One of the main focuses in data correlation is to filter through large collections of collected data with the goal of finding instances where the collected data can further support your stance or viewpoint.   Once data has been attributed towards your goal, it has gone from being obtuse to usable.
For instance, focus groups provide a multitude of members to get opinions about a given topic,(Ranjit Kumar, 2014, Research Methodology, pg 193). These opinions can be based on experience,  preference, or simply provide a sample group to demonstrate public opinion on a matter.  
The downside to focus groups is that the choice of the group can be used to dissuade public opinion much like the public feels that many news groups are (Gallup, 2018, Americans See More News Bias).  Have you ever watched the news or a late night show and wondered why there are slack jawed yokels giving their opinion on a situation?  It's not that the news agency or show host didn't interview more intelligent people, it is that they purposefully left out the data that did not support their case or point of view.  Look at the Jimmy Kimmel Live skit on What's your Password, (Jimmy Kimmel, 2017, What's your Password?). In this skit, several people are interviewed, and every one of them is demonstrating a very poor personal policy in regards to password strength.  Many of them admitted what their password was on air, and some who didn't release it at first fell victim to basic phishing techniques. 
Another shortfall to this method is where the groups are chosen from.  If you are trying to support a conservative concept, it is probably not a good idea to pull your focus group sampling from Los Angeles, or New York as these cities trend towards a more liberal nature and opinion. 
For the references I used, there are both qualitative and quantitative references.  The Gallup article for instance included a pole of 19,196 adults from all 50 US states whom were 18 and older, (Gallup, 2018, Americans See More News Bias).  It also represents a secondary source as the data collected from it was provided by a mass media source being Gallup and its data collection of analytics. The Jimmy Kimmel reference on the other hand was a qualitative article in that the interviewer could ask about personal password protection methods in any way they wanted.  It wasn't focused in regards to the questions, but the finality was in support of the opinion that there are a large multitude of people who fail to use good password etiquette in their home.  It is also the example of a primary source in that the data collector is focused on proving that people are terrible with passwords. 
As far as my paper goes, my primary source will be myself conducting interviews with different people both in public and military organizations. For my secondary sources I will use prior research articles relating to my subject pulled from the APUs library such as " Broadhurst, Roderic (2006) Developments in the global law enforcement of cyber-crime" to support the ongoing limitations in litigating cyber crimes.
References:
-  Kumar, R. (2014), Research Methodology, SAGE publications limited, g 193
- KImmel, J. (2017), What's your Password?, pulled from https://youtu.be/UzvPP6_LRHc on 27 June 2018.
- Gallup (2018), Americans See More News Bias pulled from h
EXAMPLE
Will,
                You make a great point about how the media twists data in order to suit their needs.  I have to admit, I thoroughly enjoy watching the “man on the street” segments that go out and ask people random questions to showcase just how little people really know about a given subject.  However, I always wonder how many people they had to ask those questions to before they got the responses they wanted.  The problem with any type of video that is posted with this type of aim is that it does not provide the full context of the data that was gathered.  They show the parts that support their point while discarding anything that hurts it.  As entertaining as they may be, it distorts the public’s perceptions on the subject and furthers the rampant misinformation that comes out of news agencies that all have some type of political leaning.  If only we would stop watching them, but it is just entertaining television.  Let’s face it though, that is ratings is really what it’s all about right?
Gregg

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Starting with this provided code, add the following functionality

By
1.Starting with this provided code, add the following functionality: Replace hardcoded strings “Zero”, “One”, “Two”, “Three” in the ArrayList based on user typed input (use Scanner or JOptionPane classes). The user will be prompted for the String to be stored in the ArrayList and then hit enter. The user will be able to continue to add items to the ArrayList until they just hit enter without typing anything. Once the user does this (hits enter without typing anything), the program will display all of the elements of the ArrayList, both the index and String values, in a table. It will do this via a single loop making use of an iterator method. 2. Starting with this provided code, add the following functionality: Use a Try/Catch block so that the exception is caught and the program exits a bit more gracefully. Save this file as TryCatch.java. (Be sure to rename the Public Class accordingly.) Starting with the provided code again (without the Try/Catch block), fix the code so that
2 comments
Read more

Josie Eskander

By
  Question 1: Task 1: Report Assume you are Josie Eskander. You are writing in response to techno trading P/L’s advertisement of a new laptop at 20% below normal price. You want information on brand name, availability of service and repairs, delivery times and methods of payment. Write the letter using the seven basic parts of the letter. In the opening paragraph present a clear and courteous request. Secondly write a response from techno trading giving details and proposing the sale. Provide draft of both emails in the space below. Question 2: Task 2: Report In pairs, nominate a good and a bad letter writer. Discuss the key differences. Write a good/bad letter from techno training to Alex Antonov accepting/declining his proposal to invest in the business Question 3: Task 3: Report Write a letter from techno trading p/l to a new client ‘new realities p/l’ urging them to buy techno new virtual reality software. Make a strong argument for the product. Question 4: Task 4: Report Write a l
Post a Comment
Read more

Sandra Coke is vice president for research and development at Great Lakes Foods (GLF), a large snack food company that has approximately 1,000 employees

By
Chapter 2 I Trait Approach 33 CASE 2.1 Choosing a New Director of Research Sandra Coke is vice president for research and development at Great Lakes Foods (GLF), a large snack food company that has approximately 1,000 employees. As a result of a recent reorganization, Sandra must choose the new director of research. The director will report directly to Sandra and will be responsible for developing and testing new products. The research division of GLF employs about 200 people. The choice of directors is important because Sandra is receiving pressure from the president and board of GLF to improve the company's overall growth and productivity. Sandra has identified three candidates for the position. Each candidate is at the same managerial level. She is having difficulty choosing one of them because each has very strong credentials. Alexa Smith is a longtime employee of GLF who started part-time in the mailroom while in high school. After finishing school, Alexa worked in as many as
2 comments
Read more