Skip to main content

compatible credibility

By
After receiving feedback on your rough draft, you should have made significant changes to your rough draft. This week you will submit your final, revised draft of your researched argument paper.
The final draft of your essay should meet the following guidelines: •is between 900 and 1200 words in length; •includes direct quotations and paraphrased passages from four or more scholarly texts representing more than one side of the issue; •qualifies each of the authors (authors representing each side of the debate should have compatible credibility); •withholds personal opinion until the conclusion of the essay; •is written clearly, concisely, and accurately; •is written primarily in third-person; •includes a References page; •has been closely edited so that it contains few or no mechanical errors.
Researched Argument Checklist: Use this to evaluate your rough draft against the assignment requirements: •Does this essay present a clear argument on a topic? •Does this essay treat two sides of the argument equally and fairly? •Does the essay cite, at minimum, four scholarly sources? •Are the authors for the articles qualified? Who are they? Use signal phrases/attributive tags to introduce the authors. •What is the purpose of this essay? What does it do to meet that purpose? How effective is the argument? •Does this essay avoid second person language and limit first person language? •Are there elements of pathos, ethos, and logos in this essay? Do these appeals work together to propose a solution? •Does the essay avoid logical fallacy in the reasoning behind the solution? •Does the essay use APA in-text citation and is there an APA format references page?
CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS……

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Starting with this provided code, add the following functionality

By
1.Starting with this provided code, add the following functionality: Replace hardcoded strings “Zero”, “One”, “Two”, “Three” in the ArrayList based on user typed input (use Scanner or JOptionPane classes). The user will be prompted for the String to be stored in the ArrayList and then hit enter. The user will be able to continue to add items to the ArrayList until they just hit enter without typing anything. Once the user does this (hits enter without typing anything), the program will display all of the elements of the ArrayList, both the index and String values, in a table. It will do this via a single loop making use of an iterator method. 2. Starting with this provided code, add the following functionality: Use a Try/Catch block so that the exception is caught and the program exits a bit more gracefully. Save this file as TryCatch.java. (Be sure to rename the Public Class accordingly.) Starting with the provided code again (without the Try/Catch block), fix the code so that
2 comments
Read more

Josie Eskander

By
  Question 1: Task 1: Report Assume you are Josie Eskander. You are writing in response to techno trading P/L’s advertisement of a new laptop at 20% below normal price. You want information on brand name, availability of service and repairs, delivery times and methods of payment. Write the letter using the seven basic parts of the letter. In the opening paragraph present a clear and courteous request. Secondly write a response from techno trading giving details and proposing the sale. Provide draft of both emails in the space below. Question 2: Task 2: Report In pairs, nominate a good and a bad letter writer. Discuss the key differences. Write a good/bad letter from techno training to Alex Antonov accepting/declining his proposal to invest in the business Question 3: Task 3: Report Write a letter from techno trading p/l to a new client ‘new realities p/l’ urging them to buy techno new virtual reality software. Make a strong argument for the product. Question 4: Task 4: Report Write a l
Post a Comment
Read more

Sandra Coke is vice president for research and development at Great Lakes Foods (GLF), a large snack food company that has approximately 1,000 employees

By
Chapter 2 I Trait Approach 33 CASE 2.1 Choosing a New Director of Research Sandra Coke is vice president for research and development at Great Lakes Foods (GLF), a large snack food company that has approximately 1,000 employees. As a result of a recent reorganization, Sandra must choose the new director of research. The director will report directly to Sandra and will be responsible for developing and testing new products. The research division of GLF employs about 200 people. The choice of directors is important because Sandra is receiving pressure from the president and board of GLF to improve the company's overall growth and productivity. Sandra has identified three candidates for the position. Each candidate is at the same managerial level. She is having difficulty choosing one of them because each has very strong credentials. Alexa Smith is a longtime employee of GLF who started part-time in the mailroom while in high school. After finishing school, Alexa worked in as many as
2 comments
Read more