Skip to main content

assignment, you will identify and critique an article from a professional, peer-reviewed health journal that deals with the development of an instrument. Assume you are presenting this article to a group of stakeholders at a community meeting. Follow the directions below to complete the assignment: View the writing assignment rubric [PDF]. Identify an article that reviews an instrument that could be used to evaluate one or more of the objectives conceptualized in the Evaluation Framework Assignment from Module

assignment, you will identify and critique an article from a professional, peer-reviewed health journal that deals with the development of an instrument. Assume you are presenting this article to a group of stakeholders at a community meeting. Follow the directions below to complete the assignment: View the writing assignment rubric [PDF]. Identify an article that reviews an instrument that could be used to evaluate one or more of the objectives conceptualized in the Evaluation Framework Assignment from Module 2. Write a 1,000-to-1,500-word (4 to 5 page) critique and summary of the article you identified. Identify the article by providing the full APA reference. Critique the article by: Summarizing the strengths and limitations of the instrumentation process applied in the reviewed article. Addressing the following questions: What are the demographics of the sample used in the development or testing of the instrument? Do the demographics of the sample used in the article differ significantly from your priority population? How did the researchers go about conducting the process of instrumentation? Does the instrument have good reliability?Was any validation testing conducted? Assume you are serving as an evaluation consultant for a health agency. Based on the information located in your article, would you recommend using the instrument for evaluation of your program? Why or why not?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Starting with this provided code, add the following functionality

1.Starting with this provided code, add the following functionality: Replace hardcoded strings “Zero”, “One”, “Two”, “Three” in the ArrayList based on user typed input (use Scanner or JOptionPane classes). The user will be prompted for the String to be stored in the ArrayList and then hit enter. The user will be able to continue to add items to the ArrayList until they just hit enter without typing anything. Once the user does this (hits enter without typing anything), the program will display all of the elements of the ArrayList, both the index and String values, in a table. It will do this via a single loop making use of an iterator method. 2. Starting with this provided code, add the following functionality: Use a Try/Catch block so that the exception is caught and the program exits a bit more gracefully. Save this file as TryCatch.java. (Be sure to rename the Public Class accordingly.) Starting with the provided code again (without the Try/Catch block), fix the code so that

Josie Eskander

  Question 1: Task 1: Report Assume you are Josie Eskander. You are writing in response to techno trading P/L’s advertisement of a new laptop at 20% below normal price. You want information on brand name, availability of service and repairs, delivery times and methods of payment. Write the letter using the seven basic parts of the letter. In the opening paragraph present a clear and courteous request. Secondly write a response from techno trading giving details and proposing the sale. Provide draft of both emails in the space below. Question 2: Task 2: Report In pairs, nominate a good and a bad letter writer. Discuss the key differences. Write a good/bad letter from techno training to Alex Antonov accepting/declining his proposal to invest in the business Question 3: Task 3: Report Write a letter from techno trading p/l to a new client ‘new realities p/l’ urging them to buy techno new virtual reality software. Make a strong argument for the product. Question 4: Task 4: Report Write a l

Sandra Coke is vice president for research and development at Great Lakes Foods (GLF), a large snack food company that has approximately 1,000 employees

Chapter 2 I Trait Approach 33 CASE 2.1 Choosing a New Director of Research Sandra Coke is vice president for research and development at Great Lakes Foods (GLF), a large snack food company that has approximately 1,000 employees. As a result of a recent reorganization, Sandra must choose the new director of research. The director will report directly to Sandra and will be responsible for developing and testing new products. The research division of GLF employs about 200 people. The choice of directors is important because Sandra is receiving pressure from the president and board of GLF to improve the company's overall growth and productivity. Sandra has identified three candidates for the position. Each candidate is at the same managerial level. She is having difficulty choosing one of them because each has very strong credentials. Alexa Smith is a longtime employee of GLF who started part-time in the mailroom while in high school. After finishing school, Alexa worked in as many as